Legal :: Gary Ostrow Fort Lauderdale Attorney

Gary Ostrow Fort Lauderdale Criminal Defense

Gary Ostrow Fort Lauderdale Attorney

A DUI/DWI is a difficult charge to successfully challenge. Therefore, in order to effectively protect your driving privileges, criminal portray, and freedom, it is famous to have a DUI lawyer that has exceptional experience. Ostrow & Associates has earned a reputation for trial advocacy and DUI acquittals.

Contact DUI attorney Gary S. Ostrow for a free initial consultation to discuss your defense strategy.

Reputable Client Service Since 1982 Criminal defense lawyer Gary S. Ostrow has unparalleled skill defending clients charged for drunk driving and other alcohol related offenses, such as:

DUI Driving Under the Influence

DUI Serious Bodily Injury

DUI Property Damage

DUI Manslaughter

DUI Vehicular Homicide

The firm’s criminal defense practice is centered on pursuing the most first-rate result through trial. In over 25 years of defending clients charged for drunk driving, DUI Attorney Ostrow has obtained more than four hundred acquittals or dismissed charges while defending clients at the criminal trial level.

Thorough DUI Defense

As an experienced DUI trial lawyer, Gary S. Ostrow utilizes independent investigation and analysis of chemical tests, such as blood tests, urine tests, and breath tests. He challenges the results obtained from these chemical tests, the breathalyzer functioning, the field sobriety tests, and the probable cause for the traffic finish.

Mr. Ostrow fights vigorously to protect your rights and earn successful jury verdicts.

Contact DUI lawyer Gary S. Ostrow for a free initial consultation.

For more information on DUI charges and DUI defense, please visit the DUI Information Center.

DUI Practice Center

DUI Practice Center

Call us now

Frequently Asked Questions about Drunk Driving

Q: What is “blood-alcohol concentration” or “blood-alcohol level”?

A: Blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) is the level of alcohol in the bloodstream from drinking alcoholic beverages. BAC readings are conventional in court as evidence in drunk-driving cases. The most current contrivance of measure is a breath test, although blood and/or urine testing is sometimes done. A result of .08 or higher may do a presumption of intoxication. The details of the .08 BAC presumption laws vary among the states, but all 50 states have adopted .08 as their official intoxication level, in mammoth section because of a federal threat of otherwise withholding highway funds.

Q: Can I refuse a Breathalyzer?? test?

A: Every area has its absorb version of an implied consent law providing that a driver impliedly consents to alcohol testing unprejudiced by the act of driving. In many states, a refusal to exclusive a breath test is itself a criminal violation subject to stiff penalties. For example, refusing a breath test might result in automatic drivers-license suspension or revocation. If you are ultimately found guilty of a drunk-driving offense, there may be additional penalties because of the test refusal, such as a stiffer sentence. Your test refusal may also be faded as evidence against you in a drunk-driving case.

More than 1.4 million drivers in the U.S. were arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs in 2001. Law enforcement officers nationwide are stepping up their enforcement of the drunk driving laws, largely in response to public outcry and the influence of lobbying groups such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) . If you accumulate yourself caught up in this crackdown, you need an attorney with experience defending drunk driving cases to witness out for your interests and to relieve you score the best results possible.

Florida DUI Attorney

A DUI is one of the more difficult criminal offenses to defend against. However, criminal defense lawyer Gary S. Ostrow has recovered more than 400 DUI acquittals or dismissals over the past 25 years. Attorney Ostrow is an aggressive criminal defense trial lawyer that will protect your constitutional rights and vigorously pursue the most marvelous outcome possible.

The following is provided as an overview of drunk driving laws and DUI defense. For more information or for a free initial consultation, contact DUI defense lawyer, Gary S. Ostrow today.

Overview of the Crime of Drunk Driving

Each US status has its acquire region of drunk-driving laws, but there are sure concepts and features current to most states’ drunk-driving jurisprudence. Basically, as we all know, it is illegal and a crime for a person to operate a motor vehicle after interesting alcohol and/or drugs to a degree that impairs his or her superior driving ability and judgment. Both criminal and civil penalties for drunk driving can be harsh and often include:

Loss or suspension of license

great fines

Substance-abuse treatment

Jail or prison time

Community service

Restitution

Criminal record

Restrictive probationary license programs, including ignition interlock devices and Cinderella licenses

In addition, the social stigma and enact on your career may have lifelong negative consequences.

The Role of Probation in Drunk-Driving Sentencing

Probation is by far the most favorite sentence for people convicted of drunk driving, especially for first-time offenders. Probation is a criminal sentence served in the community, rather than in jail or prison. Most states limit terms of probation to a maximum of five years. If you are facing a drunk-driving charge, an experienced lawyer can benefit you with your defense and, if important, advocate for a resplendent sentence.

The Prosecutor’s Role in a Drunk-Driving Case

Prosecution refers to the government’s role in the criminal-justice system. When criminal activity is suspected, it is up to the government to investigate, arrest, charge and bring the alleged offender to trial. A prosecutor is a lawyer who works for the government and who is responsible for developing and presenting the government’s case against a criminal defendant. Prosecutors may be called county attorneys, city attorneys, district attorneys or states’ attorneys. Some jurisdictions may even have experienced police officers act as prosecutors in drunk-driving cases. The prosecutor is the opponent or “adversary” of the criminal defendant and his or her attorney; the two sides go head-to-head against each other in court.

Read More

Reliability of Breath-Test Results in a Drunk-Driving Case

In every situation in the US, a driver with a blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) of .08 or higher is presumed to be legally intoxicated for drunk-driving purposes. Each residence has also enacted an implied-consent law. Implied-consent laws provide that every licensed driver within the residence is considered to have given his or her consent to chemical testing to choose his or her BAC whenever a law enforcement officer has reasonable suspicion of intoxication. In most states, refusal to submit to such a test results in license suspension or revocation.

Read More

The Impact of a Drunk-Driving Conviction on Your Auto Insurance

An alcohol-related car accident and subsequent drunk-driving conviction can bring many negative consequences into your life, possibly including jail or prison time, a criminal portray, car repair or replacement, restitution, guilt and deem over distress to others, higher insurance premiums, a civil lawsuit, fines, court and administrative fees, community service, alcohol education, substance-abuse treatment, social stigma, restrictions on or revocation of your drivers license, attorneys fees, restrictive probation and others. If you are arrested for or charged with drunk driving, a criminal-defense lawyer can sprint you about your honest rights and attend you fight the charges.

Read More

—————————

Drunk Driving/DUI Resource Links

About.com: Alcoholism and Substance Abuse

Links to articles and resources about drunk driving.

Impaired Driving Division – National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

NHTSA’s Impaired Driving Division provides information and resources on drunk driving from a upright and social viewpoint and with a goal of prevention.

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

Link to informational chart about the drunk-driving laws of all 50 states plus the District of Columbia.

Center for Disease Control (CDC) – Impaired Driving

Facts, data, publications and other marvelous information fascinating impaired drivers.

The Century Council

A not-for-profit organization dedicated to fighting drunk driving and underage drinking.

execute & Sexual Abuse Charges Dropped

Miami Dolphin, Ricky Williams failed drug test

Gary Ostrow argues Miami Dolphin, Ricky William’s drug test

ragged Mr. Universe sues Liquid Club’s owner. elegant model, Nikki Taylor, testifies for club owner

2 teens charged with slay in Hialeah Shooting

Gary S. Ostrow & Associates

3000 Northeast 30th spot #301

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33306

Phone: 954.566.4033

Fax: 954.566.1021

Toll Free: 1-877-All-Laws

Legal :: A Case for Courtroom Graphics

Courtroom graphics are an effective persuasion tool when trying to approach the most suitable decision for your client. This has been proven time and time again with commercials presented on television. A juror retains 15% of the information they hear and 85% of the information they gawk and hear. Summarizing detailed information with graphics greatly increases one? s ability to comprehend.

In the moral hands, the integration of text, images, data, audio and video can clearly communicate a set and sustain listeners keen. Using strong, simple graphics during the opening statement of a trial may attach a roadmap for the duration.

Courtroom graphics also allow the presenter to control the hump of the presentation. Documents need not be shuffled help and forth between parties when they can be displayed on gigantic monitors. Nowhere has the conventional adage “a represent is worth a thousand words” been more aptly applied. Graphics can simplify complicated issues. Time spent presenting a case can be reduced by as great as 50% and the cost of going to trial can be greatly reduced.

Over Presenting Courtroom Graphics

Although multimedia has found its contrivance into the courtroom in a mountainous diagram over the last decade, it is critical to disturbed information certain and straightforward with a minimum of details. Always remember first and foremost that “less is more.” disturbed graphics simply and clearly, and let the explanation of the lawyer ring through. It is well-known for the verbal presentation to work with the graphic presentation and not overlap or confuse. A lawyer should never read verbatim from the text of a presentation. This bores listeners more than anything else.

dejected text and key phrases sparingly. In addition, do not emphasize everything. This will bore the listeners and effectively emphasize nothing. The speaker should modulate their hurry and hold the listeners fervent. Emphasis should be dilapidated selectively for the most famous facts of the case.

The size, color and style of courtroom graphics should not be over-exaggerated. Eliminate ornate backgrounds and distracting fonts. Working from a template ensures consistency, and consistency conveys credibility.

Obtain follows function. Minimize your designs and maintain them well-organized. This come conveys information expeditiously and precisely.

What is Death Penalty?

Death penalty is an irrevocable crime which many people argue its effectiveness in deterring future crimes. It became a very essential race for the human rights associations such as, Amnesty International, which is working worldwide to protect human rights and abolishing death penalty. According the facts of Amnesty International, today 111 countries have abolished the death penalty in law or practice. That leaves 84 other countries which keep or unhappy death penalty (Amnesty International) . There are also victim’s rights organizations, which back the uncomfortable death penalty. It became an notable debate lately. Therefore, we should know the consequences of abolishing death penalty such as its benefits and threats to the society, its effectiveness and its role in the international arena.

Individuals and organizations who oppose the death penalty claim that it violates the proper to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. They also claim that it is an inhuman punishment which is ineffective in deterring future crimes.

Those, who abet the death penalty, claim that death penalty is effective in deterring future crimes and preserve the society a better space to live in. They also gain that there should be alternative punishments for different crimes and death penalty is a kind of punishment some criminals deserve.

While opponents claim there is no solid evidence of deterrence, people who attend the death penalty argue that our society is not able to glance the results of what is not happening. This is like hearing the news of the shipwrecks, but not hearing any news on the ones that arrived safely to the harbor.

Practice of death penalty always carries the risk of taking innocent lives. Cooper shows proof of this risk when she says, 75 people were released from death row after courts reversed their convictions (Cooper) . Those, who succor the death penalty, gain that it is extremely a cramped risk and it is decreasing as forensic science improves. They also maintain that execution of an innocent inmate is a even smaller chance than the releasing a criminal. This is credited to the careful observations made before the execution. The Jogger case is an example of fake convictions. …the putrid convictions of five teenagers in 1989 would have never near to light (Halpern) .

Organizations such as the Amnesty International timorous the fact that, death penalty punishes the bad as a reason to murder it. splendid judicial representation often results in less or no penalty, but it costs too noteworthy to be represented by a great lawyer. This station might result in changing a death row sentence to a life long imprisonment for a wealthy criminal. According to Mary H. Cooper, awful inmates often do not receive adequate moral counsel (Cooper) .

Victim’s rights organizations argue that the death penalty, in fact, does not discriminate the terrible. This accusation can not be an argument against death penalty because it is an argument against all types of punishment. The only scheme to solve this flee is to improve the justice system, which is not easily done.

Fairness of death penalty is also questionable because the prosecutor may resolve to go for the death penalty or life-time imprisonment. Some prosecutors always scrutinize for the death penalty and others may never advise this penalty, this circumstance discriminates between types of prosecution. There is also evidence that prosecutors spy for death penalty more frequently when the victim is unlit than when the victim is white (Cooper) .

Another threat of the death penalty to society is the finish of the execution on relatives and supporters of the convict s innocence. Whatever the reason for execution is, it always leaves a negative physiologically affect on the individual s supporters. relate of the daughter or son of someone executed whether he is innocent or not. These children are affected by the scheme society punishes and might become potential enemies to the system. Life-time imprisonment without parole seems like a powerful better alternative. As long as, there is no site for mistakes in the decision, supporters unexcited argue that the death penalty is the best alternative.

Victim’s rights organizations are mostly made up of people who had been affected by some kind of crimes. It is not yarn that people who lost their loved ones will behave emotionally and benefit the death penalty. An scrutinize for an gawk mentality is the basic reason these people benefit death penalty. After the harm, they can no longer exclusive a neutral stand and expose about the sprint clearly.

Death penalty supporters are also bothered because they bear life-time imprisonment of criminals is a kill of taxpayer’s money. They uncommon criminals to be sent to death row than being taken care of for a life-time (Thibault) .

Although many organizations elaborate the death penalty an new punishment, some supporters argue that the framers of the constitution supported death penalty and constructed laws to practice it, so it is not novel. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, after reviewing Callins v. Collins case, observed that:

The Fifth Amendment provides that ‘[n]o persons shall be held to respond for a capital…crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a sizable Jury…nor be deprived of life…without the due process of law.’ This clearly permits the death penalty to be imposed, and establishes beyond doubt that the death penalty is not one of the ‘cruel and original punishments’ prohibited by the Eighth Amendment (Scalia) .

One other race is that United States has not abolished the death penalty for youths. Juveniles do not have the same accurate reasoning as adults so there should be an alternative map of punishing them. According to Schiraldi, this does not seek superb on the international arena as well. He states this well, where he says: Over the last three years, aside from the United States, only Pakistan, Iran and the Republic of Congo have executed juvenile offenders –hardly the kind of human rights company we should be keeping (Schiraldi) .

Abolishing the death penalty is a requirement for joining the European Union. Republic of Turkey, who was waiting at the gates of the European Union for a longtime, has taken steps to murder death penalty although it has not been practiced for a long time. Abolishing the death penalty and practice of human rights laws is becoming a more significant dash in the international arena. Turkey has been praised for laws adopted in August to murder death penalty in peacetime (Houston stay) .

I bear it is not possible to destroy killings by executing murders. For a better society, we should be more responsible for human rights. Even though, it is a very minute risk that the executed will be innocent, I gain it is not worth it. It is also becoming a necessity to destroy death penalty for the sake of humanity in the international arena. Every country should uncommon further steps to act according to United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United States should not be in the same class of countries who practice death penalty and be an example as it is in other issues. Death penalty should be abolished at all so that it will no more be an alternative to demolish for vengeance.